| Ben Hayes on Tue, 30 May 2000 20:42:50 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| <nettime> EU_uses_Lomé_Convention_to_impose_repatriation_on_ACP_states |
Press release: embargoed until 00:01 Thursday 1 June 2000
EU USES LOMÉ CONVENTION TO IMPOSE REPATRIATION ON
THE WORLD’S POOREST COUNTRIES - By-passing
European & national parliamentary scrutiny
During the negotiations on the new Lomé Convention - £8.5 billion
aid and trade for the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP)
countries - the EU imposed a draconian repatriation clause obliging
the ACP countries to take back not only their own nationals, but
also those of other countries ("stateless" people) and rejected
asylum-seekers.
A report published in Statewatch today shows how the ACP states
had little choice but to accept the “readmission” clause, despite
taking the view that it had no basis in international law - a view
shared by the EU Council’s own legal service.
The readmission clause was not introduced until the ‘last minute’ -
at the final negotiating session on 7 December 1999.
The way the EU agreed on the imposition of the clauses on the
ACP by-passed democratic scrutiny by the European and national
parliaments. The UK Home Office described the draft decision as
“suddenly appearing” on the agenda. The EU ignored the
Amsterdam Treaty requirement that the European Parliament be
consulted.
When questioned on how the measure was able to escape
parliamentary scrutiny UK Home Office Minister, Barbara Roche,
described it as a “non-contentious” measure. Lord Tordoff, chair of
the House of Lords EU Select Committee found this response
“unsatisfactory”.
Tony Bunyan, editor of Statewatch, said:
"The Justice and Home Affairs council just nodded the readmission
clauses through - without debate - even though the report was not
meant to be on the agenda. Accountability to parliaments was
simply ignored in order to railroad the ACP countries in the
negotiations five days later - where it was claimed that it was the
policy agreed by the JHA Council and therefore mandatory.
If parliaments and civil society had known that the EU was going to
make aid and development funds for the world's poorest countries
dependent on agreeing to "repatriation" they might have had
something to say about it."
The feature is on the internet on:
http://www.statewatch.org/lome
together with two other stories from Statewatch bulletin (vol 10 no
2) concerning the by-passing of parliamentary scrutiny on EU
justice and home affairs measures: 1) EU officials to decide on
European Parliament’s influence; 2) JHA Council authorises
Europol to start negotiating the exchange of intelligence data.
Statewatch is a non-profitmaking research, education and
information service. It is an independent group of journalists,
researchers, lawyers, academics and community activists and has
a network of contributors drawn from 12 European countries.
Statewatch will shortly be launching an on-line news service.
Contact details:
PO Box 1516, London, N16 0EW. UK
tel: 00 44 (0) 20 8802 1882
fax: 00 44 (0) 20 8880 1727
e-mail: office@statewatch.org
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net